About: Arguing for the Constitution: If you call yourself a right-winger, you're doing it WRONG!
This book offers a unique and reasoned system of arguing politics by philosophically centering our Constitution and defining the political left, right and the intensities of politics. It exposes the trickery employed by those who claim that our foundation of law is “living and breathing.” Foundations are clearly set and political measurements actually have a baseline.
Numerous historical references explain the logic of arguing for our Constitution, including the admonitions by many historical figures for a nation to stay out of debt.
As this book works from initial points, also known as bench marks; several machinists and engineers have told me that it’s the first book they’ve read on politics that makes sense. America’s leading talk show host told me that my idea of centering the Constitution was something that he profoundly endorsed and heartily agreed with.
The Constitutional Initial Point, the system of defining politics that is studied in the book, is unique. The actual characteristics that put political acts on the left or right is defined. The center is defined. The intensities of political acts is defined. This exposes the liberal habit of calling people “extremists” to be nothing more than name-calling.
This book is different, and a serious study.